FieldHockeyCorner.com

2008 Ratings as of November 23, 3:38 pm
by Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)

Division 3

South Atlantic

  Great Lakes  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic  South South Atlantic West    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1TCNJ15-3 99.10.7070.665
2Messiah17-2 99.10.7020.638
3Rowan15-5 98.20.6510.618
4William Paterson15-4 97.50.6300.576
5Eastern15-7 97.20.6210.600
6Wilkes17-4 96.50.6160.551
7Montclair State11-7 96.60.6140.615
8Lebanon Valley18-4 98.30.6120.543
9Elizabethtown17-4 97.30.6050.537
10Kean17-5 96.50.5990.542
11King's15-5 95.90.5700.509
12Catholic14-8 96.20.5680.546
13FDU9-11 95.20.5550.590
14Misericordia12-8 95.10.5450.526
15Cabrini16-6 94.20.5240.457
16Alvernia10-9 95.10.5180.515
17Susquehanna8-11 94.80.5160.548
18Ramapo7-9 94.40.5150.540
19Drew9-9 94.60.5120.516
20Manhattanville5-12 93.90.5030.572
21Delaware Valley10-9 94.50.4980.489
22Juniata9-12 94.50.4940.516
23Widener6-12 94.10.4890.540
24DeSales7-12 93.40.4730.508
25Neumann10-11 92.70.4690.467
26Scranton9-10 94.00.4680.466
27Moravian6-11 93.20.4600.495
28Marywood10-9 92.60.4540.430
29Richard Stockton4-14 92.70.4430.516
30Gwynedd-Mercy7-11 91.90.4280.441
31Arcadia5-15 91.90.4160.471
32Albright4-15 91.90.4070.473
33Philadelphia Biblical6-12 90.90.4050.429
34Saint Vincent7-9 91.00.4010.389
35Immaculata6-12 91.30.3890.408
36Goucher4-14 91.70.3760.427
37Cedar Crest3-13 89.40.3420.393
38Rosemont2-13 88.20.3140.375

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home